Sindoor ceasefire, diplomacy for terrorists: 5 claims of Rajnath, Shah and Jaishankar Reboot Opposition. Bharat News

Last update:July 29, 2025, 14:05 IST

Pahalgam, Sindoor and Mahadev: Defense Minister Rajnath Singh, Home Minister Amit Shah and EMS Jaishankar offered a detailed explanation while answering the questions raised by the opposition

From the ceasefire, the loss of India, security failure and failure of diplomacy in Operation Mahadev, Prime Minister Narendra Modi-Netroine Center in the Lok Sabha rebelled a point-by-point of opposition claims on Operation Sindoor.

Defense Minister Rajnath Singh, Home Minister Amit Shah And the Minister of External Affairs S Jaishankar offered a detailed explanation on 22 April, answering the questions raised by the opposition to the Opposition Opposition, May 7 Operation Sindoor and Operation Mahadev.

1. Ceasefire

After the four -day military conflict, India and both Pakistan It was announced that on May 10, a ceasefire was agreed after a hotline communication between his DGMOS (Director General of Military Operations). However, the opposition repeatedly extended US President Donald Trump’s remarks that “he mediated and offered trade deals”.

What Rajnath Singh said: “Operation vermilion was stopped because we had fulfilled our objectives. To say that it was done under any pressure. This purpose was not to capture the area but to destroy its terrorist nursery. The objective was not to go to war … Pakistan accepted defeat and requested that hostility be stopped.

Did Jaishankar said: “On May 10, we received a phone calls while sharing the impression of other countries that Pakistan was ready to stop the fight. Our situation was that if Pakistan was ready, we needed to receive it as a request to the Pakistani side through DGMO channel.” From April 22, there was no call between Prime Minister and President Trump – when President Trump called for his sympathy to 17 June – When he called for PM – When he called PM in the day. “

What Amit Shah said: “India covered a distance of 100 km inside Pakistan to destroy the terrorist infrastructure. Six radar systems of Pakistan were destroyed. They attacked our residential areas, but we did not do so. We only attacked their air bases and ruined their attacking capabilities. Our armed forces were intact. And their ability to attack was destroyed. Pakistan had no option But to surrender. On 10 May, Pakistani DGMO called our DGMO, and we stopped the struggle at 5 pm, “Shah said.

2. Diplomacy failure

What Jaishankar said: On the claims of the opposition of diplomacy failure, Jaishankar said: “… There were many phone calls, there were many conversations, there were 27 calls at my level, at the Prime Minister level, about 20 calls, about 20 calls, about 35-40 calls, about 35-40 came in support, and we tried to make a story to make a story. Three, apart from Pakistan, three, Operations are opposed, if you see this period, and I see this period, and I see this period, and I see various governments, and I see various governments, and I see various governments through this period, and I see various governments through this period, and I see various governments through this period, and I see various governments through this period and I am very happy to share with the house on positions, so the world’s belief is that terrorism is unacceptable, the country that has been attacked has the right to defend itself, and that India said.

Jaishankar highlighted the support of Quad and BRICS. “Quad made a statement that the quad unevenly condemns all the tasks in all forms of terrorism and violent extremism and all forms of violent extremism. We condemn the strongest words of terrorist attacks in Pahgam on 22 April, and without any delay,” Member, this Iran is the form of a member, Brazil, South Africa, Egypt.

The Eam also highlighted the designation of the Lashkar-e-Toba, resistance front, which claimed the responsibility for the attack. “American designation of TRF. On July 17, the state department nominated TRF as a foreign terrorist organization, and a specially designated global terrorist. Now, it comes in the wake of extradition of Tavavur Rana, which was involved in the 26/11 attack. Here TRF was nominated because of us, so no one was nominated for a global terrorist organization. It was because our diplomacy persuaded another country to do so. “

He explained how India prepared diplomatically for military action. He said, “What we tried to make was a story and diplomacy was prepared for the launch of Operation Sindoor. The result of that diplomacy was that only three of the 190 countries of the United Nations, apart from Pakistan, opposed Operation Sindoor,” he said. “Heavy, there was a belief that terror was unacceptable and the country that was attacked has the right to defend itself and India was doing it right.”

What Amit Shah said: “Today, China is in the United Nations Security Council, and not India. Modi ji is trying his best to be a part of the United Nations Security Council. Jawaharlal Nehru’s stand is responsible for this … When we were facing Chinese soldiers in our Javans Doklam, Rahul Gandhi had a meeting with Chinese highways. Gandhi…,” He said.

3. At the loss of India

What Rajnath Singh said: While he did not clarify whether India loses any fighter jet during enmity, he said that no “important property” was harmed. He also said that no soldier was harmed during the struggle. “I am proud to say that our air defense system, counter-drain system, and electronic devices completely thwarted this attack by Pakistan. Pakistan could not kill any of our goals, and any of our important property was damaged. Our security system was impregnable, and every attack was thwarted …” He said.

“Some members of oppression are asking how many of our aircraft were shot?

4. Safety failure

Whereas Shah said responsibility The Pahgam was with the government, he questioned what the Congress did when he was in power. He said that some of those who spread terror during the UPA were killed by Modi.

Shah called Batla house encounter And said that over 25 major attacks occurred within 6 years, killing around 1,000 people; However, the then Manmohan Singh government at the Center “did nothing”.

“In 2002, Atal ji’s NDA government brought POTA (The Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002). Then who objected to POTA? It was a Congress party … After coming to power in 2004, Sonia Gandhi-Manmohan Singh Sarkar abolished the POTA law … Because Congress took advantage of POTA?”

“… yesterday, they (Congress) were questioning why there was no war … Today, POK is only present due to Jawaharlal Nehru … In 1960, in 1960, he gave 80% Sindhu water in Pakistan … In 1971, during the Shimla Agreement, they forgot to know about (Congress).

5. Where did the terrorists go? Operation Mahadev is the answer, Shah says

Shah said, “He was asking yesterday where to go to Pahalgam’s criminals … who were hidden during your tenure, were being discovered today and are being killed … At least 100 people are killed by our forces … On May 7, our job was completed at 1.26 pm … It was not the government of Manmohan Singh. The base was so accurate that it shook the air defense system of Pakistan …”

While providing a detailed timeline of the operation, Shah said that Operation Mahadev was launched on 22 May 2025. A high-level security meeting was called the same evening. “The attack took place at 1 pm. I reached Srinagar by 5:30 pm,” he said.

Shah said that on the same day, Intelligence Bureau (IB) received specific human intelligence about the presence of terrorists. Dachigam Forest Range. That night a decision was taken that criminals should not be allowed to escape from Pakistan under any circumstances. Security forces then move rapidly to close the passage of possible escape routes and to track the movement of the attackers rapidly.

Operation led the successful abolition of three Lashkar terrorists, known as Suleman alias Hashim Musa (alleged mastermind), Jibran and Hamza Afghani. Their presence was detected through coordinated human and technical intelligence during a month’s discovery.

See comments

first published: