,
Trump administration wants to deport more migrants in third countries
,
Critics ask why migrants cannot be taken out instead
,
The trump strategy stokes fear amidst the large -scale exile
By Christina Cook and Ted Hessen
Washington, – The Trump administration says that some serious criminals need to be deported in third countries as even their home countries will not accept them. But the review of recent cases shows that at least five people were threatened with such fate, sent to their original countries within weeks. President Donald Trump aims to illegally deport millions of immigrants in the US and his administration has demanded the removal of third countries, including sending guilty criminals to South Sudan and Avatini, first known as Swaziland, two sub-Sahara African nations.
The migrants convicted of crimes usually served their American sentences before being deported. It appeared with eight people in the case of south Sudan and five deporting Ishwatini, although a few were released years ago.
The US Department of Homeland Security said in June that the exile of the third country has “allowed people to be taken out of such a specific barbarity that their own country will not take them back.” Critics have stated that it is not clear that the US tried to return the South Sudan and Avatini to the exiles in their domestic countries and exile was unnecessarily cruel.
Reuters found that at least five people were sent to their home countries later to threaten Libya in May, according to interviews with two men, a family members and lawyers. An American judge stopped the Trump administration from sending him to Libya, two men from Vietnam, two men from Laos and a man from Mexico were sent to his home countries. Exile has not been reported in advance.
DHS did not comment on the expulsion. Reuters could not determine whether the countries of his home initially refused to take him or the US tried to send him to Libya.
DHS spokesperson Trisia McLaglin said that the domestic countries of deported criminals in the third countries were ready to withdraw them, but did not give details about any attempt to return home to five men before Libya threatened to return home.
“If you illegally come to our country and break our laws, you can end in Sekot, Guantanamo Bay, or South Sudan or any other third country,” McLaglin said in a statement, referred to, referred to and a prevention center in subtropical fluorida Everalids.
Away from home, DHS did not respond to the request of the number of exile of the third country as Trump took over on January 20, although thousands of people in Mexico and hundreds of other countries. The eight people sent to South Sudan were from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, South Sudan and Vietnam. According to filing in a court, DHS said that Sudan had exile order from South Sudan. According to DHS, five people sent to Avatini were from Cuba, Jamaica, Laos, Vietnam and Yemen.
White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said that South Sudan and Eswatini were deported by deported people “the worst” and included those convicted in the United States’ child sexual abuse and murder. Jackson said in a statement, “The American community is safe with these heinous illegal criminals.”
The Laos government did not respond to the requests to comment on Libya for exile and men who threatened South Sudan and Eswatin for deported people. Vietnam’s Foreign Ministry spokesman said on July 17 that the government was confirming the information about South Sudan exile, but did not give additional comments to the Reuters.
The Mexico government did not comment.
The Trump administration, while filing in court on May 22, admitted that a person from Myanmar had valid travel documents to return to his country, but was sent to South Sudan anyway. The DHS stated that the man was convicted of sexual harassment in which a victim was unable to resist mentally and physically. The government of Eswatini said on Tuesday that it was still holding five migrants sent to separate jail units under the deal with the Trump administration.
‘A very random result’ The Supreme Court in June allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants in third countries, without giving them a chance to show that they could be damaged. But the validity of the expulsion is still being fought in a federal trial in Boston, a case that may be back to the potentially conservative-blooming High Court.
Critics say the goal of removing is to prevent fear among migrants and encourage them to “self -exile” to their home countries, rather they have no connection to be sent to distant countries.
“This is a message that you can finish with a very random result that you are going to like very little if you choose to leave under your own steam,” said Mitchell Mittalstad, Communications Director, Non-Partison Migration Policy Institute. The internal US immigration enforcement guidance released in July states that migrants may be sent to countries that did not provide the subsequent diplomatic assurance of their security in six hours.
While the administration has highlighted the exile of criminals convicted in African countries, it has also sent refuge to Afghans, Russians and others to Panama and Costa Rica. The Trump administration deported more than 200 Venezuela people on charges of being a member of the gang in Al Salvador in March, where they were held in the country’s Sekot Jail without reaching the lawyers till the release of a prisoner last month. According to the Mexican government data, more than 5,700 non-Maxican migrants have been sent to Mexico since Trump took over, which continues a policy launched under the former President Joe Biden.
The fact is that a Mexican person was sent to the South Sudan and another Libya was threatened with exile, suggesting that the Trump administration did not try to send him to his domestic countries, according to Treina Realmuto, the pro -immigrant national immigration litigation coalition.
“Mexico historically accepts his own citizens back,” said Realmuto, one of the lawyers, who represents migrants in the trial, who are involved in the exile of the third country. Eight people deported in South Sudan included the Mexican National Jesus Munoz Gutirez, who sentenced a second degree killing in the US and, according to Realmuto, was taken directly into federal immigration custody. Court records suggest that Munoz killed and killed a roommate during a fight in 2004.
When the Trump administration first started exile in late May, Mexico President Claudia Shinbam said his government was not informed.
“If he wants to be replicated, the United States will have to bring him to Mexico,” Shinbam said at that time. His sister, Gwadalupa Gutirez, said in an interview that he did not understand why he was sent to South Sudan, where he is currently in custody. He said that Mexico is trying to take his brother home.
“Mexico never rejected my brother,” Gutirez said.
‘Use us as a piece’
Immigration radicals see the expulsion of the third country as a way to deal with immigration criminals, which cannot be easily deported and can pose a threat to the American public.
Jessica Vaughan, Policy Director, Center for Immigration Studies, said, “The Trump administration is giving priority to the security of these exiles to the comfortable American communities.”
The Trump administration to take the nation of migrants and Pacific Island Rashtra Palau in July.
Under the US law, the federal immigration officers can deport someone other than the place of citizenship when all other attempts are “impractical, inevitable or impossible.”
Immigration officers should first try to send an immigrant back to their country, and if they fail, in a country with whom they have a relationship with where they lived or born.
For a Lao man, who was almost exiled in Libya in early May, hearing about the exile of the third country renewed, he took him back to his close call. In an interview by Laos, on the condition of anonymity for his safety for his safety, he asked, “Why America was using us as a pawn?”
His lawyer said that the person had sentenced him to jail for hooliganism. Reuters could not establish what he was convicted.
Recalling the officials, he said that he was asked to sign Libya to sign his exile order, which he refused, told him that he wanted to be sent to Laos instead. He said he would be sent to Libya, whether he is signed or not, he said. DHS did not comment on the allegations.
The person coming to the United States as a refugee in the early 1980s, when he was four years old, said that he was now trying to learn the language and be suited to his new life, “was taking it day by day.”
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without amending the text.
