Lesson from the history of rebellion in AIADMK and DMK

In the public discourse on the attack in AIADMK, many wonder the party’s general secretary Edappi. Palaniswami should not follow the example set by his predecessor Jayalalithaa and the founder of the organization MG Ramachandran to withdraw those who were once important to those who were once important.

In this context, former ministers SD Somasundaram (SDS) and K. Kalimuthu are being referred to, which were re -adjusted by MGR and Jayalalithaa respectively, after the period of separation from bitter criticism.

Similarly, if someone takes a look at the history of DMK, then former President of the party M. There are many examples of Karunanidhi, which are withdrawing many prominent personalities, including Sathiawani Muthu and Nanjil. Manoharan is involved, which is in the organization for all those against him politically.

SDS spat with MGR, Jayalalithaa

The SDS was one of those who came out of the DMK when MGR formed the AIADMK in 1972. He often used to say: “I am working with him for the development of thick and thin and AIADMK.” After being a revenue minister in the MGR cabinet for six years at a stretch, the SDS developed opinion of opinion in some cases with the Chief Minister around July 1984, such as entry tests for admission to professional colleges and Sri Lankan Tamil issues.

Expressing his views on these issues, he was “brutally blunt”, Hindu Reported on 10 July 1984. This was when his portfolio was converted from revenue to food. Asked about these differences at a press conference in Tiruchi, he said: “Why should I leave the party or leave the party?” The SDS called himself “strict discipline”, which discharge his work as a minister with all “honesty and integrity”.

At the same time, some district units of AIADMK organized a black-flag demonstrations against him and passed a resolution to boycott it. He was one of Jayalalithaa’s bitter critics (then spelling Jayalalithaa), who was the party’s promotional secretary and Member of Parliament (Rajya Sabha). At one level, he accused him of being a “real chief minister”. He trained his guns on MGR, alleging that nothing was done to stop corruption and remove “bootleygers and robbers” from the party, although it was more than two months, as the Chief Minister took an oath to do so, the newspaper told the newspaper on August 28, 1984.

He also landed on the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, with whom MGR had re -established relations for the topping of the National Conference rule in Jammu and Kashmir and the dismissal of the NT Ram Rao Ministry in Andhra Pradesh, which took place in a month’s case. When AIADMK executives met in Chennai on 1 September, the SDS estimated that the party’s decision -making body recommended the removal of them. Three MLAs followed him after removing the cabinet and party. His reaction to his dismissal was: “I am happy to be out of the cabinet headed by a corrupt Chief Minister.”

Later, he swam a party – Namdu Kazgam. At the time of the 1984 Lok Sabha and Assembly elections in the state, he initially tried to attack an election deal with DMK, but Karunanidhi Beparda. This forced him to go alone, and his nominations were fielded in 150 assembly constituencies and 15 Lok Sabha constituencies. The party’s performance was destructive. He suffered a derogatory defeat at the hands of a low-term AIADMK candidate in his domestic constituency, Pattukkottai and seized the deposit.

अपनी राजनीतिक गतिविधि में लुल्ल की अवधि के बाद, एसडीएस ने अप्रैल 1986 में, राज भवन के लिए एक जुलूस निकाला और गवर्नर एसएल खुराना को एक ज्ञापन प्रस्तुत किया, जिसमें एआईएडीएमके शासन के खिलाफ केंद्र सरकार द्वारा एक जांच आयोग के संविधान की मांग की गई, ताकि वह एक्साइज, वाणिज्यिक करों, जंगलों, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, परिवहन, Transport, and it was when MGR’s health was failing and he visited the United States at intervals from time to time for check-up.

In November that year, the SDS surprised everyone when he called the Chief Minister to his Ramvaram residence and returned to AIADMK a few days later. The irony is that he later became a prominent member of the Jayalalithaa camp at the party and failed from Thiruramrambur as a candidate for AIADMK (Jayalalithaa) in 1989. He once again became Revenue Minister in 1991 and organized a portfolio for five years, before turning again against Jayalalithaa.

Kalimuthu vs Jayalalithaa

Like SDS, Kalimuthu, in the second half of the 1980s, could not cover herself for Jayalalithaa’s rise in the Dravidian Major. He was one of his famous batter, along with former minister RM Veerappan. In 1985, when MGR again made Jayalalithaa the publicity secretary after a brief break, and there were rumors that she could also be included in the cabinet, Kalimuthu, who was a minister in the MGR cabinet during 1977–86, openly expressed her reservation. But according to a report Today India (November 30, 1985): “Kalimuthu has gathered signature of legislators on a statement to oppose Jayalalithaa’s possible induction in the cabinet during MGR’s Deewani in New York earlier this year.

At the time of partition in AIADMK after MGR’s death, he was naturally with Janaki Ramachandran faction. In the January 1989 assembly poll, he finished fourth in Tabi, not able to maintain his deposit. When the two groups later came together, he was one of those who opposed the merger and established a party called AIADMK (MGR). However, in May, she chose to work under Jayalalithaa, who nominated her to the Shivkasi Lok Sabha constituency during the general elections at the end of that year. Although he left AIADMK after about a year, he returned and in 2001, he was made the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly.

Rebellion of Satiawani Muthu

In DMK, in 1974, when Chief Minister Karunanidhi consolidated his post after the MGR departure from the party in October 1972, Harijan Welfare (which was the subject of Adi-Dharvidar and Adivasi Welfare in the 1970s) revolted against him by Minister Sathiawani Muthu. On the floor of the assembly, he surprised everyone by leveling allegations of being non-co-operatives to meet welfare measures for castes scheduled for castes. He also alleged that for the development of SCS, funds were used to promote the welfare of backward classes. The Chief Minister initially demanded the outfits of them to exclude the differences with them by seeking details from them and assuring the public to take action in the wrong way. But he repeated his criticism and in May that year, he was removed from the cabinet. Muthu floated a party before merging with AIADMK. He even strongly criticized Karunanidhi’s publication.

Muthu was elected to the Rajya Sabha and in 1979, when MGR expressed support to the broken faction of the public under the leadership of Charan Singh for the claim of power in power at the Center, he and A. Bala Pajnore was chosen to be the representative of his party. Muthu’s attempt to enter the assembly was not successful after a gap of eight years during the 1984 assembly poll as she lost in Perambur. She was with Janaki Ramachandran at the time of the party’s partition before returning to DMK in 1989.

Nazil Manharan’s exit and re -entry

Four years later, it is Nazil. It was Manharan’s turn, who was the Finance Minister in the first cabinet (1977–80) of MGR and later returned to DMK to express his views against Karunanidhi. In the second half of June 1993, Manoharan, who was the Deputy General Secretary of DMK at the time, published a poem in a supporter-DMK Tamil daily, which was believed, within the ranks of the Dravidian Major, within the ranks of the Dravidian Major, for the purpose of “indecent and wile” and party leadership. Dainik later took another poem, which was indirectly criticized by Manoharan, who later denied that he had insulted Karunanidhi. He did not mean DMK chief in poetry. He and Mr. Karunanidhi had mutual love and affection and their friendship was “more than five decades,” Hindu Informed on 25 June 1993.

However, the party’s leadership felt that “is enough” and decided to dismiss it. He was apparently triggered for Manoharan’s poem, he was unaware of the Nyasi Board of DMK Trust. Nevertheless, within a few days, Manoharan expressed regret and presented a letter, in which the party was re -admitted.

One of the leading party MPs, the party was also amid restlessness between Karunanidhi and Vaiko (then known V. Gopalsam). It was said that Manoharan’s “U-turn” was due to his failure to rope in many district secretaries, as well as to challenge the leadership on the removal issue of Mr. Vaiko. When Mr. Vaiko was revolting against Karunanidhi after five months, Manoharan was taken back to the party. She then accused Chief Minister Jayalalithaa that she used to accuse the DMK President of being behind the resistance of Mr. Vaiko, the newspaper reported on 5 December 1993. In May 1996, Manoharan was included in the cabinet led by Karunanidhi and four years later, four years later, he died in Harness.

An experienced member of AIADMK, who knows the history of the two Dravidian parties, however, says that now in his party’s case, former leaders, O. The group led by Panneraselvam, VK Sasikala, and TTV Dhinkaran, not positively signs to work under the leadership of Sri Palani. Nevertheless, a long-standing member of the AIADMK, who is now with Mr. Panneerslavam, says his group leader has expressed the readiness to join hands with the body of unconditional parents. It seems that the leading leaders of AIADMK, both the past and the present, are still for appreciating the importance of the past lessons.