Actor Sharib Hashmi has revealed that missing out on key roles in two major Bollywood films remains a lingering disappointment in his career. In a recent interview, Sharib shared that he had auditioned multiple times for the role of Kamli in Sanju, the biopic on Sanjay Dutt directed by Rajkumar Hirani. The part eventually went to Vicky Kaushal and became one of the film’s most loved performances.
Actor Sharib Hashmi reveals his regrets about not landing roles in Sanju and Bajrangi Bhaijaan, despite being shortlisted after multiple auditions for both films.
Sharib Hashmi on losing roles in Sanju and Bajrangi Bhaijaan
Opening up about the missed opportunity, Sharib told Filmigyan, “Mujhe Sanju ka ek bada afsos hai, jo role kiya tha Kamli ka, uske liye mein kaafi shortlist hua tha, kaafi time tak chal raha tha. To vo ek afsos hai. Fir Bajrangi Bhaijaan me jo Nawazuddin Siddiqui ne kiya tha, uske liye bhi mene audition diya tha aur shortlist hua tha, kuch rounds of audition hue the mere, but vo naseeb ki baat hai. (One big regret I have is Sanju. For the role of Kamli, I was shortlisted, and the process lasted quite some time. So that remains a regret. Then, for Bajrangi Bhaijaan, the role that Nawazuddin Siddiqui played, I had auditioned for that as well and was shortlisted. I went through a few rounds of auditions, but that’s a matter of destiny).”
About Sanju and Bajrangi Bhaijaan
Released in 2018, Sanju featured Ranbir Kapoor in the lead role as Sanjay Dutt. The film traced the controversial life of the actor, from his troubled youth and struggles with substance abuse to his imprisonment in the 1993 Bombay blasts case and eventual comeback.
Vicky Kaushal’s portrayal of Kamli, a fictionalised version of Sanjay’s close friend Paresh Ghelani, was widely appreciated for its emotional depth and loyalty-driven arc. The film was a massive commercial success, earning over ₹500 crore worldwide, making it one of the highest-grossing Hindi films of its time.
Sharib also recalled auditioning for Bajrangi Bhaijaan, directed by Kabir Khan and headlined by Salman Khan. In the film, Nawazuddin Siddiqui played Chand Nawab, a quirky Pakistani TV journalist who assists Bajrangi in reuniting a mute Indian girl with her family on the other side of the border. The heartwarming drama went on to collect over ₹900 crore globally, becoming one of Indian cinema’s biggest blockbusters.
Sharib Hashmi’s latest
Recently, Sharib Hashmi featured in Gustaakh Ishq, a romantic drama produced by Manish Malhotra, alongside Vijay Varma and Fatima Sana Shaikh. He was also seen in Happy Patel: Khatarnak Jasoos, a spy comedy backed by Aamir Khan and directed by Vir Das. Beyond films, Sharib has also returned to his writing roots. He recently wrote a stage play in collaboration with Tannishtha Chatterjee, marking a significant creative milestone in his theatre journey. He will also be seen in Welcome To Jungle, which features an ensemble cast starring Akshay Kumar, Suniel Shetty, andRaveena Tandon, among others.
There is no fitness concern over Zimbabwe captain Sikandar Raza ahead of their must-win Super 8 clash against India in the T20 World Cup. All-rounder Ryan Burl dismissed any doubts, confirming Raza is “100 per cent” fit despite taking a blow against the West Indies.
Raza had taken a blow during Zimbabwe’s previous outing against the West Indies, sparking speculation about his availability for the high-stakes encounter. But Burl made it clear that keeping Raza out of a big game—especially against India—was never really an option.
“Sikandar Raza is 100% playing. Good luck telling him that he’s not going to play against India. Yeah, he’s going to be playing,” Burl said at the pre-match press conference.
Zimbabwe face India in a crucial Group 1 Super 8 fixture at the MA Chidambaram Stadium on Thursday, with both sides desperate for a win after suffering defeats in their previous matches. A loss could severely dent semi-final hopes for either team.
Burl acknowledged the scale of the challenge, particularly playing India in front of a partisan home crowd, but pointed out that the pressure of expectations could weigh heavily on the hosts as well.
“Yeah, it is a must-win match for us, but it’s also a must-win game for India. There’s obviously a lot at stake here, being a World Cup game and if we are to progress to the semifinals, we both want to look at winning tomorrow’s game,” Burl said.
“Obviously, we don’t get to play India a lot, so it’s something that we really have been looking forward to. Playing India in India is a challenge in itself. They obviously got a home ground advantage, but the added pressure of both teams needing to win tomorrow’s game.
“Pressure does funny things to teams. And obviously it being a World Cup, there’s that added pressure as well. We hope to execute our process tomorrow,” he added.
Zimbabwe are banking on their bowling depth to counter India’s explosive batting unit led by captain Suryakumar Yadav. Burl underlined the importance of match-ups and tactical flexibility in Chennai’s conditions.
“We’re doing a lot of our homework. Obviously, India’s got that firepower where they go really hard in the power play and if they don’t lose wickets, they’ve got guys that can go hard throughout. We’ve obviously got a lot of options (in bowling) and that’s probably one of the advantages of the Zimbabwe lineup.
“We’ve got a left-arm seamer, right-arm seamer, a couple of leg-spinners, an off spinner, and a left-arm offie. So, we do have quite a lot of depth and I think it will probably just come down to what are the match-ups depending on the batters that are out there and, obviously, the combinations that we do look to go for,” he explained.
Reflecting on their heavy loss to the West Indies, Burl insisted the team has moved on and drawn valuable lessons from the setback.
“To be honest, I think we can only take positives from that defeat. It sounds weird, but we hadn’t really had a bad game until then. So there is massive learning in that.
“And in saying that, India obviously also had their bad game against South Africa. So we’re both looking to bounce back, and no better place than to do that tomorrow,” he said.
With Raza declared fully fit and the stakes at their highest, Zimbabwe head into Chennai believing they can turn pressure into opportunity against a host side equally determined to stay alive in the tournament.
After spending ten years carving out a space in the film industry, Taapsee Pannu sees her role in ‘Dunki’ as a well-earned breakthrough. She admits that landing such large-scale commercial projects isn’t easy for actors with her trajectory, but believes her earlier, offbeat choices slowly reshaped how the industry sees her—transforming her into a credible mainstream lead.
Taapsee Pannu says landing a film like ‘Dunki’ took years of steady work and was never guaranteed. The actor described the Rajkumar Hirani directorial as a rare opportunity in her career and called it a reward after a decade in the industry. Pannu stressed that big commercial films remain difficult for her and for many actors who are not seen as typical mainstream choices.
Taapsee Pannu on struggle to land ‘Dunki’
Speaking to SCREEN, Pannu explained why films like ‘Dunki’ do not come easily to her. “A film like Dunki is difficult to get for someone like me because I’m not considered a commercial, mainstream, viable heroine,” she said. She added that the role worked in her favor because the character needed someone with her sensibility.Pannu linked the opportunity to her earlier choices. “I got Dunki because I did films like Assi and Gandhari. These films have given me my space and identity in the industry. This is my reality,” she noted. She described ‘Dunki’ as a “gift” she received after more than ten years in cinema.The actor admitted that even after success, large commercial projects are uncertain. “I don’t know how long it will take for me to get another one. It’s still a struggle because people have to come to terms with the idea of presenting me in a more glamorous, mainstream space,” she said.
Industry perceptions and new projects
Pannu also pointed out what she sees as an irony. “I started my career in the South with massy films, and my Hindi film debut was with David Dhawan. It doesn’t get more commercial and in-your-face than that,” she remarked.Directed by Rajkumar Hirani, ‘Dunki’ marked his first collaboration with Shah Rukh Khan. The film featured Taapsee Pannu alongside Boman Irani, Anil Grover, and Vikram Kochhar, with Vicky Kaushal in a special appearance.Meanwhile, Pannu is earning praise for her role in ‘Assi,’ a courtroom drama directed by Anubhav Sinha. The film also stars Kani Kusruti, Revathy, Manoj Pahwa, Kumud Mishra, and Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub and focuses on urgent legal and social questions.
An early agenda item for Tata Sons Pvt.’s six board directors when they convened at 11:30 am on Tuesday at Bombay House—the group’s storied headquarters—was expected to be straightforward: approving a third term for Natarajan Chandrasekaran as chairman.
Tata Trusts Chairman Noel Tata. As the first non-family, non-heir chairman at Tata Sons, Chandra faces mounting pressure from Noel—a Tata family scion intent on asserting greater influence over how the group is run. (PTI)
Within two hours, the conversation had veered off course. What had looked like a done deal, with Tata Trusts itself recommending the reappointment just months ago, quickly unraveled.
Noel Tata, the head of Tata Trusts, began pressing Chandra—as he’s widely known—with tough questions. Most critically, Noel sought assurances that the group’s holding company could avoid a public listing, people familiar with the matter said, asking not to be named as the discussions were private. Tata Trusts is a collective of 13 charities, which together control two-thirds of Tata Sons.
Noel also laid down several conditions: restraining debt levels, stemming losses—especially at Air India, and reaching a swift settlement with Tata Sons’ largest minority shareholder—Shapoorji Pallonji Group, the people said. The SP Group, which owns about 18.4% stake, was locked in a corporate and legal battle with Tata Sons for years and is still looking to monetise a part of its stake.
While some of Noel’s demands were negotiable, discussions hit a wall when Chandra said he could not guarantee a waiver from India’s banking regulator on the listing issue—since that decision lay outside his control, the people added.
Preserve Stability
By 3:30 pm in Mumbai, Chandra had left the board meeting. As he waded through a swarm of TV cameras outside Bombay House, he offered a brief response to questions about what transpired at the board meeting: “I recommended that it should be deferred.”
By deferring a decision on his own reappointment, Chandra signalled that consensus between Tata Sons and Tata Trusts was essential to preserve stability at the salt-to-software conglomerate already battling headwinds in multiple sectors. It also reflected a hard-earned learning for the group after it was rocked by a scathing courtroom and boardroom battle in 2016.
The group “has historically placed a premium on unanimity in key board decisions, and the absence of that consensus appears to be driving the deferral,” Utkarsh Sinha, managing director at boutique investment banking firm Bexley Advisors, told Bloomberg News.
Chandra’s current terms runs until February 2027, ensuring no immediate leadership vacuum at the $180 billion Tata Group. Yet the day’s events had stoked the possibility that another power tussle may be brewing. As the first non-family, non-heir chairman at Tata Sons, Chandra faces mounting pressure from Noel—a Tata family scion intent on asserting greater influence over how the group is run.
Representatives for Tata Trusts and Tata Sons did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comments.
‘Realigning Stakeholders’
“There are no credible successor names being floated at this stage,” Sinha said. “That suggests the delay is less about transition planning and more about aligning key stakeholders on capital structure, strategic priorities, and the pace of investment across new businesses.”
If Chandra is eventually reappointed, it would provide continuity as the group pursues ambitious projects from semiconductors to mobile manufacturing. But Noel’s stance makes clear that the balance of power between the Tata Trusts and the holding company remains unsettled, reviving echoes of the board battles that shook the group a decade ago.
In 2016, Tata Sons abruptly ousted then-chairman Cyrus Mistry. The move, orchestrated by Ratan Tata—the then head of Tata Trusts—shattered the group’s reputation for quiet consensus and turned its leadership transition into a public spectacle.
Tata Trusts holds a 66% stake in the closely held Tata Sons, the holding company governing the group’s largest listed entities, including Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., Tata Steel Ltd., and Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Ltd.—owner of Jaguar Land Rover.
Tata Sons’ potential listing stems from a regulatory classification. In 2022, the Reserve Bank of India designated the company as an “upper-layer” non-banking financial institution—a category that requires firms to go public within three years to enhance transparency and governance. That meant a deadline of September 2025 for Tata Sons to list its shares. There has been no update from the RBI or Tata Sons on the state of play on this front.
Despite the mandate, Tata Sons has made no immediate preparations for this share sale. Its leadership believes the regulator will extend the deadline, and after recent engagements with officials, expects formal communication from the RBI granting more time.
Chandra has made clear that while he personally favours keeping Tata Sons private, he cannot offer an absolute guarantee. Should the RBI insist on a listing, compliance would take precedence over internal preferences, the people said, citing Chandra as having informed the directors.
That uncertainty weighs heavily on the Shapoorji Pallonji Group. Any delay for a Tata Sons IPO effectively closes off a potential liquidity window for the debt-laden conglomerate, which has struggled with financial stress exacerbated by the pandemic. Its stake in Tata Sons remains illiquid, making a resolution critical to its debt-reduction plans.
While Chandra enjoys strong support from the Indian government—earned through execution of high-stakes national projects such as semiconductor fabrication and mobile manufacturing—Noel Tata draws strength from a different source: the deep-rooted confidence and blessings of the Parsi community whose members have controlled the Tata Group since its inception in 1868.
Appointed in 2017 to steady the ship after the ouster of Cyrus Mistry, Chandra has done more than just restore confidence. Under his leadership, revenue for the group’s 15 largest listed entities has nearly doubled while their profits have more than doubled.
His tenure is also defined by high-stakes ambition, from launching India’s first homegrown semiconductor plant to navigating TCS through the volatile rise of AI to turning around the unprofitable carrier, Air India.
“Nothing changes,” Chandra said on Tuesday, when asked about the immediate impact on Tata Group’s leadership, before his car pulled away.
Jammu and Kashmir captain Paras Dogra sought to play down the head-butting flashpoint that marred the Ranji Trophy final on Wednesday, insisting it was “not a big thing” even after being penalised for the incident. His response came after he was fined 50% of his match fee for headbutting Karnataka substitute fielder KV Aneesh during a heated exchange on Day 2 in Hubballi.
Mayank Aggarwal argues with Jammu and Kashmir’s captain Paras Dogra during the second day of the Ranji Trophy 2025-26 final. (PTI)
“It was just in a little heat of the moment. Not a big thing. Yeah, it is all settled now. That’s (a hot day) a different thing, and it was momentary. We started talking and chatting after that, so it’s all well,” Dogra told reporters after the close of play on Day 2.
The ugly moment briefly overshadowed a high-quality contest and triggered sharp reactions on the field, with players from both sides stepping in as tempers flared in the middle of a tense title clash. Dogra’s comment, however, suggested he did not view the confrontation as something serious, despite the disciplinary action that followed.
The incident took place shortly after Dogra struck a boundary off India pacer Prasidh Krishna. As the ball ran away, words were exchanged between Dogra and Aneesh, who was fielding as a substitute close to the bat. In a sudden escalation, Dogra moved toward Aneesh and head-butted him on the helmet, forcing immediate intervention from nearby players and officials.
Dogra, 41, was batting in a crucial phase of Jammu and Kashmir’s innings and had been helping steady his side. The confrontation added to the intensity of an already charged final, with Karnataka pushing hard for breakthroughs and J&K trying to build on their position.
Dogra’s innings and the on-field tension
Before the controversy, Paras Dogra had played an important hand for Jammu and Kashmir. He eventually made 70, contributing valuable runs in the summit clash before his dismissal. The veteran’s knock came under pressure, but the disciplinary breach now risks becoming one of the defining talking points of the match.
The sequence also highlighted how quickly emotions can spill over in a domestic final, especially in a game carrying major stakes and featuring several experienced players. While verbal exchanges and aggressive body language are not uncommon in big matches, physical contact crosses a line that match officials and administrators rarely ignore.
Dogra’s attempt to downplay the matter by calling it “not a big thing” may not fully calm the debate around player conduct in the Ranji Trophy final. With a formal fine already imposed, the episode is likely to remain under scrutiny even as the focus returns to the result and the performances that shaped the contest.
For Jammu and Kashmir, Dogra’s contribution with the bat still carried value. But for many watching, his 70 will now be remembered alongside an avoidable moment that took attention away from the cricket.
The latest episode of The 50 brought both emotion and drama, with Krishna Shroff opening up about her personal life in a candid conversation that caught many by surprise. The fitness entrepreneur confirmed that she is in a live-in relationship with Afghan MMA fighter Abdul Azim Badakhshi, sharing how their unexpected love story began.
Krishna Shroff makes a personal revelation
Recalling their first interaction, Krishna said they initially crossed paths at a fight event in Mumbai. “He had a fight in Mumbai, and I was there because Tiger co-owned a team that was playing opposite him,” she shared. What started as a casual moment soon turned into something more when Azim reached out to her on Instagram. “I saw his DM; he had just said ‘Hi’. I replied, and he immediately asked for my number,” she said with a smile, adding, “No one had ever approached me with so much confidence, and I like that.”
Despite language barriers, he speaks Persian while she is more comfortable in English, the two built a strong connection. Krishna revealed that for nearly eight months, they only spoke through video calls and phone conversations before finally meeting properly. When Azim eventually came to India, they spent two weeks together in Goa, a time she describes as deeply emotional.
“When we were saying goodbye at the airport, we didn’t know if we would ever meet again. We were both crying,” she admitted. But fate had other plans. Azim decided not to return to Afghanistan, and Krishna flew to Delhi to spend more time with him. “Those three weeks changed everything. Our relationship became much stronger,” she said.
It was during that time that she made a bold decision. “I asked him if he wanted to move in with me in Mumbai. We moved in together immediately. He lives in Mumbai now,” she confirmed.
Talking about what love means to her, Krishna reflected, “For me, love is when you put the other person before yourself. If he is okay, I am okay.” She described their journey as “crazy” and “mad,” admitting that some moments are too personal to share publicly.
Guess who re-enter The 50
The episode didn’t just focus on romance. It also saw a dramatic twist with Karan Patel and influencer Vanshaj Singh re-entering the show as wildcard contestants, sparking tension and fresh confrontations among the participants.
“Leribault’s priority will be to strengthen the safety and security of the building, the collections, and people, to restore a climate of trust, and to carry forward, together with all the teams, the necessary transformations for the museum,” France’s culture ministry said in a statement about his appointment.
Psycho Saiyaan arrives with promise, a psychological thriller starring Tejasswi Prakash, Anud Singh Dhaka and Ravi Kishan, and a premise that hints at mystery and emotional complexity. Unfortunately, what unfolds is a frustratingly uneven film that struggles to keep its audience engaged, leaving more questions about its execution than its story.
All about Pyscho Saiyaan`s plotline
Right from the beginning, Psycho Saiyaan wrestles with its own identity. The narrative attempts to balance psychological intrigue with mainstream dramatics, but ends up satisfying neither. The writing feels muddled and cluttered, with twists that seem forced rather than earned. Instead of building genuine suspense, the film leans on predictable turns and tired tropes that do little to elevate the viewing experience.
Tejasswi Prakash, despite her efforts, is let down by a script that underutilises her talent. While she delivers earnest moments as the female lead, the character feels one dimensional, leaving little room for emotional depth or development. Similarly, Ravi Kishan’s performance, though intense at times, is weighed down by a screenplay that lacks focus and clarity. Both actors appear constrained by writing that fails to give them enough to truly shine. Anud Singh Dhaka fails to give the hero vibe with his character Kartik. The actor looks more confused than psychotic as his character sketch defines.
What didn`t work for the show?
Another major downfall of Psycho Saiyaan lies in its pacing. Instead of building tension step by step, the film jumps between scenes with awkward transitions, robbing key moments of impact. What should feel like escalating suspense often feels like rushed confusion, leaving viewers detached rather than intrigued. The narrative attempts to juggle too many elements, including backstory, psychological tension, and surprise twists, without ever tying them together convincingly.
The thriller genre thrives on sharp writing and tight plotting, but here both are conspicuously missing. The film’s attempt to be clever often comes off as contrived, with revelations that feel more like clichés than surprises. At times, scenes are stretched unnecessarily, weakening rather than strengthening the mood.
In the end, Psycho Saiyaan is a missed opportunity. A taut psychological drama needs a taut script, but this film delivers neither tension nor coherence. For viewers hoping for an engaging thriller, what they will find instead is a disjointed and disappointing watch. A muddled narrative and underwhelming execution make Psycho Saiyaan a forgettable thriller despite its promising cast.
New Zealand vs Sri Lanka Live Score, T20 World Cup 2026 Super 8: Sri Lanka must address their struggle against spin bowlers when they face New Zealand in a must-win Super Eight match of the T20 World Cup on Wednesday.
The hosts failed to chase 147 against England on a slow surface in Pallekele. Batting conditions in Sri Lanka have been more demanding compared to co-hosts India, and the pattern is expected to continue at the Premadasa Stadium, where larger boundaries limit six-hitting.
Shot selection came under focus after the loss in the Super Eight opener, and Sri Lanka will look to correct those errors.
“It’s a T20 game, so obviously you come into a game, so you are looking to score as many runs as you can. So when the ball is not coming on to the bat, it’s easier said than done,” Sri Lanka’s batting coach Vikram Rathour reflected on the side’s poor poor performance.
“Are there better options? Yes, definitely could have been taken. I thought on a wicket where the ball is stopping, so pushing is not a great idea. A couple of our wickets lost out on guys pushing for a single. I don’t think that was a great option in these conditions,” he added.
Pathum Nissanka has led the batting effort so far, while left-arm spinner Dunith Wellalage has performed with the ball. The fast bowlers have also delivered in the tournament.
New Zealand shared a point with Pakistan after their match at Premadasa was washed out. They have spin options, including captain Mitchell Santner.
With no rain forecast, both teams will aim for their first win in the Super Eight stage.
New Zealand openers Finn Allen and Tim Seifert were in form during the league phase and will look to continue that run.
Rachin Ravindra is also expected to contribute after scoring a fifty in his previous innings against Canada.
Actress Daisy Shah is currently working on a film being directed by singer-turned-filmmaker Palaash Muchhal. Palaash was in the news last year for his wedding with Indian cricketer Smriti Mandhana, which was eventually called off. The two were set to tie the knot in November but reportedly called it off on the day of the wedding. Amid the controversies surrounding him, Daisy has described Palaash as a “good person.”
Daisy Shah calls Palaash Muchhal a good person
In an interview with Filmygyan, Daisy said she came in contact with Palash through his sister, singer Palak Muchhal, who had sung a song in her film Jai Ho. Speaking about Palaash, Daisy said, “Palaash is very good as a person. In fact, I have met him a couple of times. Palak had done a song for Jai Ho, so I have known her since then. I frequently attend parties at Palak’s home for birthdays and Ganpati pooja, and that’s how I met Palash. That’s how I got to know that he is a music composer and a director.”
Further talking about the Muchhal family, Daisy added, “I met his family — a beautiful family. They are very grounded and believe in God. I think that is the good part about them. Those who believe in God are positive people.”
About Palaash and Smriti Mandhana
Palash Muchhal and Smriti Mandhana were set to tie the knot on November 23, 2025, after dating for several years. However, the wedding was later called off, which Mandhana confirmed through a social media post.
After the wedding was called off, the internet was abuzz with speculative theories, with many assuming that Palash was found cheating on Smriti during the wedding festivities.
Weeks later, Smriti issued an official statement regarding the matter. “Over the past few weeks, there has been plenty of speculation around my life, and I feel it is important for me to speak out at this time. I am a very private person and would like to keep it that way, but I need to clarify that the wedding has been called off. I would like to close this matter here and implore all of you to do the same. I request you to please respect the privacy of both families at this time and allow us the space to process and move on at our own pace,” her post read.
